This thread seems to have gone dead last few days. On the bright side, I may actually have something good to contribute now I have the lc9 and recently had a sr9c. If anyone is considering either of these 2 I have some decent input
sr9c pros: striker fired, trigger was nice and smooth and predictable. Field stripped nice. Loaded chamber indicator is nice. Cons: big as a medium glock. Was too thick and bulky for concealed carry. Ambidexterous safety would get kicked on and off from my shirt catching it. I don't know if it was me orr the gun but I could hardly hit anything with it.
Lc9 pros: small, conceals really nice ( shorts and t-shirt nice) really accurate for its size. Safety can be removev from the gun completely without negative effect ( trigger pull is long enough you have to really mean it to get it too go off, and I leave it off while carrying) only cons so far are that it's hard to take apart beyond a basic field strip and they come with a magazine disconnect ( mine was removed) and the lc9 is also $100 cheaper than the sr9c.